Subject	2nd that.
Posted by	WAGGZ on November 18, 2006 at 11:56 AM
	This message has been viewed 33 times.
In Reply To	I'd do the pulley, not the ECU posted by SactoTodd on November 18, 2006 at 11:53 AM
Message	BTW, how much more power does the NA ECU supposedly make? I've seen claims ranging from 5 to 20 HP.
Follow Ups	Would you add an UD pulley or ECU upgrade on an NA? - danlarky 11:47:06 11/18/06 Neither is worth it. - PennStateZ 11:50:38 11/18/06 Disclaimer: I'm lazy. - PennStateZ 11:55:48 11/18/06 Pulley. The ECU isn't worth the money for the NA. (n/m) - Guapo 11:52:45 11/18/06 I'd do the pulley, not the ECU - SactoTodd 11:53:31 11/18/06 2nd that. - WAGGZ 11:56:07 11/18/06 I have no idea - SactoTodd 11:58:51 11/18/06 False. - ZJeweler 12:18:22 11/18/06 Very good....but we were talking aboot ECUs. =) (n/m) - WAGGZ 12:20:07 11/18/06 Doh! - ZJeweler 12:26:15 11/18/06 The ecu is a good investment; - escturbo 13:27:54 11/18/06 We saw appreciable gains >> - Ash's Z 13:07:35 11/18/06 The ECU offers more performance enhancement than - Ash's Z 13:10:56 11/18/06 I saw a substantial difference in power when I installed - sfpearl300zTT 15:31:01 11/18/06 3rd (n/m) - Guapo 11:56:43 11/18/06 4th... If I were still NA and could do it over. (n/m) - AbsolutZ (OH) 14:13:37 11/18/06 5th, definately just get a pulley. (n/m) - TTFairladyZ 18:03:17 11/18/06 just do pulley - turbomaniac 18:01:17 11/18/06 NOS. A little spray won't hurt. (n/m) - Red Z 18:13:09 11/18/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.